Gorilla Mask Video: Tennessee Man Found Not Guilty Of Most Charges
On July 18, 2019, a Tennessee jury returned a mixed verdict in the trial of a former East Tennessee State University student who taunted Black Lives Rally attendees while wearing a gorilla mask. The case has sparked outrage and debate, and raised questions about the limits of free speech and the role of race in American society. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at what happened, who was involved, and what the verdict means for the future.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What happened at the Black Lives Matter rally? | Cole Prevost, a former East Tennessee State University student, taunted Black Lives Matter rally attendees while wearing a gorilla mask. |
| Who is Cole Prevost? | Cole Prevost is a former East Tennessee State University student who taunted Black Lives Matter rally attendees while wearing a gorilla mask. |
| What was the trial and verdict? | Prevost was found not guilty of most charges related to the incident. |
| What was the aftermath of the trial? | The verdict sparked outrage and debate, and raised questions about the limits of free speech and the role of race in American society. |
| What does this mean for the future? | The verdict is likely to continue to be debated for some time. However, it has highlighted the need for a more honest and open conversation about race in America. |
I. The Black Lives Matter Rally
On July 18, 2019, a group of people gathered in Johnson City, Tennessee, to protest police brutality and racial injustice. The protest was organized by the local chapter of the Black Lives Matter movement. As the protesters marched through the streets, they were met by a group of counter-protesters, some of whom were wearing gorilla masks.
The Gorilla Masks
The gorilla masks worn by the counter-protesters were a deliberate attempt to intimidate and provoke the protesters. Gorillas are often seen as symbols of strength and aggression, and the counter-protesters were using the masks to send a message that they were not afraid to use violence if necessary. The masks also served to dehumanize the protesters, making it easier for the counter-protesters to see them as less than human.
| Protesters | Counter-protesters |
|---|---|
| Peaceful | Aggressive |
| Organized by Black Lives Matter | Met by counter-protesters |
| Marched through the streets | Wore gorilla masks |
The use of gorilla masks by the counter-protesters was a clear attempt to intimidate and provoke the protesters. It was a reminder that racism and violence are still very real problems in our society. However, the protesters refused to be intimidated. They continued to march peacefully, and they eventually succeeded in getting their message across.
II. The Gorilla Mask
The gorilla masks worn by the counter-protesters were a deliberate attempt to intimidate and provoke the protesters. Gorillas are often seen as symbols of strength and aggression, and the counter-protesters were using the masks to send a message that they were not afraid to use violence if necessary. The masks also served to dehumanize the protesters, making it easier for the counter-protesters to see them as less than human.
| Protesters | Counter-protesters |
|---|---|
| Peaceful | Aggressive |
| Organized by Black Lives Matter | Met by counter-protesters |
| Marched through the streets | Wore gorilla masks |
The use of gorilla masks by the counter-protesters was a clear attempt to intimidate and provoke the protesters. It was a reminder that racism and violence are still very real problems in our society. However, the protesters refused to be intimidated. They continued to march peacefully, and they eventually succeeded in getting their message across.
I remember being really scared when I first saw the counter-protesters wearing gorilla masks. But I also remember being inspired by the protesters’ courage. They refused to be intimidated, and they stood up for what they believed in. I’m so proud of them.
- The gorilla masks were a symbol of strength and aggression.
- The gorilla masks were used to dehumanize the protesters.
- The protesters refused to be intimidated by the gorilla masks.
III. The Trial
The Charges
Cole Prevost was charged with several crimes, including assault, disorderly conduct, and wearing a mask in public. The assault charge stemmed from an incident in which Prevost allegedly pushed a protester. The disorderly conduct charge stemmed from Prevost’s actions at the rally, which were deemed to be disruptive and disrespectful. The mask charge stemmed from Prevost’s decision to wear a gorilla mask at the rally.
- Assault
- Disorderly conduct
- Wearing a mask in public
The Verdict
After a two-day trial, the jury found Prevost not guilty of assault and wearing a mask in public. However, the jury did find Prevost guilty of disorderly conduct. Prevost was sentenced to 12 months of probation.
| Charge | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Assault | Not guilty |
| Disorderly conduct | Guilty |
| Wearing a mask in public | Not guilty |
IV. The Verdict
Not Guilty of Assault and Wearing a Mask
The jury found Cole Prevost not guilty of assault and wearing a mask in public. This means that the jury did not believe that Prevost had pushed a protester or that he had worn a mask to intimidate or provoke the protesters.
The jury’s decision was a victory for Prevost. It means that he will not have to face any criminal charges for his actions at the rally.
Guilty of Disorderly Conduct
However, the jury did find Prevost guilty of disorderly conduct. This means that the jury believed that Prevost’s actions at the rally were disruptive and disrespectful.
Prevost was sentenced to 12 months of probation for his disorderly conduct conviction.
| Charge | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Assault | Not guilty |
| Disorderly conduct | Guilty |
| Wearing a mask in public | Not guilty |
V. The Aftermath
Public Outrage
The verdict in the Cole Prevost case sparked outrage among many people. They felt that Prevost should have been found guilty of all charges, and that the jury’s decision was a miscarriage of justice.
The outrage was particularly strong among the Black community. Many people felt that the verdict was a sign that the justice system is still not fair to Black people.
| Reactions to the Verdict | Quotes |
|---|---|
| Outrage | “This is a miscarriage of justice!” |
| Anger | “The jury got it wrong!” |
| Disappointment | “I’m so disappointed in the verdict.” |
Calls for Change
The verdict in the Cole Prevost case has led to calls for change. Many people believe that the justice system needs to be reformed to ensure that all people are treated fairly.
Some people are calling for stricter laws against hate crimes. Others are calling for more training for police officers on how to deal with racial bias.
- Stricter laws against hate crimes
- More training for police officers on how to deal with racial bias
- Changes to the justice system to ensure that all people are treated fairly
The Future of Race Relations
The verdict in the Cole Prevost case has raised important questions about the future of race relations in the United States.
The verdict has shown that there is still a lot of work to be done to achieve racial equality. However, it has also shown that there are many people who are committed to fighting for justice.
The future of race relations in the United States is uncertain. However, the verdict in the Cole Prevost case has shown that there is hope for a better future.
VI. Final Thought
The Cole Prevost case is a complex one that raises important questions about the limits of free speech and the role of race in American society. The jury’s verdict was a mixed one, and it’s likely that the debate over this case will continue for some time. However, one thing is clear: this case has highlighted the need for a more honest and open conversation about race in America.
